To quote a certain morose aging British pop icon, stop me if you think that you've heard this one before:
1. Female comics [reporter/professional/blogger/casual fan] on the internet expresses an opinion on a comics-related subject. Said opinion is generally a valid criticism but it is deemed exceptionally controversial by a small but highly vocal subset of dudebro comics fanboys by virtue of said woman's critique expressing [criticism of/challenging opinions about/insufficient fawning over] their [favorite comic/creator/fandom/viewpoint].
2. Said woman is judged guilty of the oh-so-unpardonable "crime" of Speaking Out While Female (or SOWF for short).
3. The same woman is attacked online by said dudebro fans, sometimes egged on by a creator with legions of fans and twitter followers. Said attacks begin with questioning her authority, knowledge, professionalism and credibility but then escalate to the point of issuing the woman online rape and death threats.
4. The woman recounts her horrible harassment experience on their Twitter feed/blog/Tumblr.
5. More female comics creators, staffers, journalists, and amateur bloggers are inspired to relate their horror stories of harassment and abuse.
6. Popular mainstream comics blogs write about the woman's harassment story and more articles appear, including myriad "[you/we] men need to [stop harassing women/speak up/hold each other accountable/fix this]" articles.
7. Reactions among various male professionals and fans vary:
a. Some are shocked -- SHOCKED, I tell you! -- that this type of behavior happens in their fine comics establishment.
b. Some deny that this type of thing happens or is widespread, or say it's no worse than other industries.
c. Some accuse the women of being "too emotional". Commence mansplaining.
d. Some use strawman false equivalency arguments: "But men are threatened too." (That was an actual response on Twitter from a male poster.) Bring on the victim-playing.
e. Some get overly defensive. Cue "not all men" response --- to a question that
nobody asked.
f. Some make empty showboat gestures.
g. Some actually defend said rape threats and claiming they constitute free speech, demonstrating a frightening ignorance about both free speech
and its limitations.
h. Others join the women online in being pissed. And asking questions. And trying to figure out how to stop it. And expressing frustration. and so....
8. Much brainstorming among fans and professionals about how to fix the problem ensues.
9. Some male professionals take to their blogs/Tumblrs/Twitter feeds to take a verbal stand against the abusive behavior. Unfortunately.....
10.
None of them are upper level management.
11. Said upper level management, particularly at the Big Two, remains
utterly silent and unresponsive on the issue, and so....
12.
Nothing major gets done. Meaning...
13. Abusive parties face
absolutely no real world consequences whatsoever. Offending comics pros retain their high-profile flagship superhero jobs on books like Superman or X-Men without so much as a reprimand. Harassers continue harassing with impunity.
14. Poorly moderated comic site comments sections
remain poorly moderated comic site comments sections.
15. New distraction takes everyone's attention. Story dies. Much online outrage dies with it.
16. Marginalized parties continue to be abused online. Some give up completely. Many quit their [careers/blogs/online presence].
17. Many women and girls looking to have anything to do with comics are discouraged from doing so.
18. Comics companies (particularly the Big Two) and comic site forums continue to pander to lowest-common-denominator straight white dudebros, leading them to feel more irreplaceable. And more empowered. And more entitled to
use that power.
19. Repeat step 1.
It's become a broken record. The same
damned broken record. Being played
over and over and OVER....!
And it's infuriating. And frustrating.
These are people who let even a scintilla of power go to their heads, despite being lifelong fans of characters like
Superman whose
entire reason for being is to teach us
not to let power go to our heads. In their minds, their right to be as abusive and assholish as they want trumps the rights of others, particularly women, to even safely exist in what these would-be gatekeepers deem "their" spaces. They consider their abusiveness and harassment to be free speech when what it actually represents is the
suppression of others' freedom of speech. (They also forget that threats of violence such as rape actually
aren't constitutionally guaranteed speech.)
This lowest common denominator doesn't comprise a majority of geeks, or even
male geeks, but they seem to be the ones with a disproportionate level of power. The ones that comics companies and blog comments sections apparently deem irreplaceable and vital to the continued well-being of comics.
But they're not. They're a fucking
cancer.
They cost the industry the diversity it needs to keep from becoming stale. They cost the industry potential readers driven away from an environment that makes them feel unwelcome. And they cost us things like
this.
That was a self-portrait by
Tess Fowler. Beautiful artwork, don't you think? Can you imagine her drawing a Vertigo or Image series, or even a Big Two comic like, say,
Wonder Woman? Well, you can
forget about it, thanks to sexual harassment. How many talents like her were denied to the industry because they deemed it too hostile to them? How many potential classics did we fans never get to read?
Too damned many.
It's important that we self-assess and call out bad behavior among ourselves and those we associate with. Even
shunning them if necessary. However, that alone won't be sufficient, in much the same way that neighborhood recycling programs are useless if we let Koch Industries subsidiaries poison entire states' water supplies or cause tar sands leaks. We have to pressure the big publishers and comics media sites to take action. We have to raise enough of a stink that they
can't ignore it.
It won't be easy. These bullies are very dedicated to maintaining their dysfunctional status quo. They're less prone than we are to be distracted by things like having real lives. (Remember, these are the folks who send rape threats to women who dare question the need for enormous fake breasts on an underage girl.) Their optimum condition is the use of power on those they deem weaker than themselves; our optimum condition is to relax and get on with our lives.
But it's necessary for the sake of not only our hobby, but the lives of our wives or sisters or daughters.
Or, in my case,
potential future daughters.
Those of you who don't follow me on Twitter might not be aware that my wife and I are expecting a second child this fall. We've decided to find out the baby's sex in advance, though we're not far enough along to test yet. If we have a daughter, I
don't want her to have to go through the shit online that women are going through today.
I think we, as individuals and as a comics culture, have to take a leaf from the late
Nirvana singer
Kurt Cobain.
It's even more important for comic industry brass to heed his example.
Because if they don't follow Cobain's lead in vetting their fan base and their books' creators, they may find their industry following his example in
another manner:
Suicide.
(Special thanks to
Andrew Weiss and
Tom Foss for creative inspiration. But an even greater thanks to heroines like
Janelle Asselin and too many others to name for continuing to speak out.)
